lint

Sunday, March 27, 2005

humor in the language that starts with M

I'm having an affair with a professor who's nearing retirement-- the grotesque differential of our ages and the fact that he's married put me off somewhat, I'll own-- but then, when I'm in his presence, I'm compelled by his personal magnetism, pulled to him irresistibly. but also I'm tired of waiting around for him to get to me-- after all his more important buisiness, lecturing and so on-- so I go to campus to find him, feeling bold and confident. only when I see him evidently busy and important, all he says to me is, "did you translate your joke?" and then my heart sinks, because I remember that I've been given this tiny piece of homework to do, so small, two lines only to be translated into an obscure eastern european language-- and I've forgotten to do it. so I go off then to take care of it, this one little responsibility of mine in the complicated heist-type thing we're planning-- my part to waylay the foreign personnage by telling him this joke, and then, once he's distracted, all the other cogs can move into place. but first I've got to translate it. so off I go to the library of this tiny liberal arts college, in search of a dictionary of... not moldovan, some other language whose name starts with an M... probably made-up. and I'm browsing the reference works that are stacked on top of the old card catalogs, but there are all these dumb happy students standing around the place, going through the card catalog in a leisurely manner and yammering away-- so annoying-- so at last I grab my dictionary on the obscure M language and go off to find a quiet place to write my translation. but there are these dumb happy leisurely students seemingly everywhere I look, clustering together at tables in twos and threes and big cumbersome groups-- one of these last is strung along one long side of a library study table, all facing in the same direction-- so I look off, trying to determine the object of their gaze, but all I can see is a carnival set up on the horizon-- and I choose a chair very near the end and sit down close to the table's edge so as not to impede their view.

Saturday, March 26, 2005

herbert hoover

poor guy. what a bum rap he's given.

I like to go out to the museum and homestead in west branch and read about the bootstrap boy, the self-made man. what tragic timing-- blamed for the Depression. as if one man might singlehandedly effect so much. but we have historically granted our public figures such inhuman stature. lionized and demonized.

I like to drive into the farmland and look at the hair wreath woven by his mother. artifact of an entirely other age. think of it! to build a decorative object out of one's own hair. and I understand it was not an uncommon craft. such a dark and tangled object, so suggestive.

and, golly, what and age to live in, and through. to draw yourself up out of, to stride across wide, low-slung hills-- to step across the slow mississippi and on into the East where the world begins, where America in fact got made. to take an active and determined role in all of that, by choice.

unfathomable from here.

money

"now give me." "a lot of." "wow, yeah, you need."

preoccuppied out of sleeping by the documentary I watched earlier today, born rich by jamie johnson-- heir to the johnson & johnson fortune, who made a project out of interviewing his inner circle friends about the unmentionable word. fascinating. depressing. surprising (particularly seeing a young man I actually know on the screen, being interviewed, and whom I did not realize--perhaps simply because I'd never stopped to think about it, but more likely due to that hushed characteristic of the wealth-- belonged to that echelon).

and what interesting timing in my own life to be watching this and considering specie in its most phenomenal form. because I am currently and most personally, and have been for the main of the last few months (certainly not the first such period), chronically short of cash. as in, thank goodness for overdraft protection. as in, frequently unable to scrape together change to buy cigarettes. as in, raised with plenty and yet unpossessed of the tools to either manage or create. compelling, humbling, and generous lessons from life.

because if I hadn't had to go through this, lightly bottom out, as it were, I probably never would have found occasion or means to confront the kernel of disfunction. the shame. the anxiety and apotheosis.

raised patently upper middle class but consistently with an air of just-hanging-on-by-the-hair-of-our-chinny-chin-chins (one that was indelible if quite likely manufactured), I reached post-college adulthood and the first lesson out of the gate: "um, what the fuck do I do now?" as in, how do I provide for myself adequately, capably, and maturely. and all these years later, the answer continues largely murky-- only just, and through most-embarrassing-insolvency, beginning to come clear: manage it. look it in the eye, at last, and count it, make an accounting of it. somehow this, seemingly indispensable, part of the equation never made it into the original construct.

and consequently my siblings and I have all suffered our financial throes. none of us is especially good with lettuce. no, let me amend that. we are, all four of us, notably bad, characteristically and spectacularly unadept where the almighty dollar is concerned. we spend it, and that seems to be the extent of our literacy on the subject. so some of us have been fortunate in our choices of spouses, helpmeets to assist and offset our clan debility. and some of us have not. this one of us at least sits with her own incapacity on a daily and geometrically compounding basis, and finally comes to understand the white devil in her blood. attains its name if not the ability to command it, just yet.

and those kids on the video screen. those most elderly and ignorant and urbane kids you'll ever see-- their lives cast and commanded by the dollar sign. so deeply enculturated by it, by money. by money alone--how weird that is. well, of course not money alone, of course as well all its addenda of privilege. but money primarily, money nominally if widely unspokenly, money essentially. fascinating, as I said, and dreadful. deeply depressing-- not for want of it, not in envy of that privilege, the shiny clubs, the tailored hair-- no no-- only pity. yeah, that's what I said. what awful creatures of an all-consuming master, what a pitiable state of being.

and then I realize this boon: that I was never so rich, and there is, in this, hope for me yet.

also, I should add this: good for you, young mr. johnson. for daring to venture through the passage where the rest, your cohort, your elders (your own father) quailed at the prospect of entry. forbade discussion as strict taboo. leveraged the law, outright suing you for the hubris of the breach. and still you persevered, cracked that tight nut right open and laid the contents out for the world to consider-- yourself not least of all. and I sincerely hope it may do you the greatest good.

Sunday, March 20, 2005

aneuploidy & enallage

thanks to a fine and cleverest new friend, I'm reading this morning about mosaics, chimeras, and freemartins. fascinating stuff, not to mention poetically named. although the science starts to get a little scary and even pretty awful once they get into grafting baby animals... for those with a soft heart, I recommend you stop reading before you hit the geep. the folks up in arms about dolly would go wacko over this one, I suspect.

and then there is enallage. this is one I'll have to share with my approaches to teaching writing students-- the intentional breaking, or twisting, of rules. what hey.

Saturday, March 19, 2005

borg me

so, yeah, the rumors you've heard are true: I, sarah holmes townsend, have eaten crow and, at long last, joined friendster after having vowed never to touch it with a high-jump pole.

a friend asked me recently, "so what's with all the social networking?" and I was thinking about it the day before yesterday in the car and felt compelled to pull out my little car notebook (man, that thing's getting a workout these days) and, right in the middle of the burlington/gilbert intersection, start scribbling down my response. here it is:

let's just say I am not unlike the fabled groundhog-- at the first whiff of spring, I clamber from my burrow into the light (this year apparently in full regalia) and cavort about.

and then I started thinking a bit more about that regalia, and it occured to me that, tho rather novel, it bears striking similarities to what/who I've been in the past. I seem to be seized of late by a spirit of fresh combinatorial self-invention: '80s hair, '90s overalls, and '00 body.

also, I suspect, the diss kicking into gear may be having some influence upon my productivity level (read: mania)-- at last the tunnel ahead reveals a pinhole of brilliance. I cannot shout it forcefully enough: WHOOPEEEEE!!!

the same friend as above reacted with particular surprise (dare I say disdain) to my recent friendster membership: "do people still use that thing?" I've, obviously, been trying to work up an appropriately withering retort, with little success. the best I can come up with is, "no, they don't. at least not the cool people. only us lame-o third-wave latecomers."

and then I think about maybe sticking out my tongue and going, "nyeah, nyeah." what do you think-- too much?

picking up on an earlier conversation

...I suppose the central and most honest question, from my perspective, becomes: what are your main objects in a) teaching writing and b) writing yourself?

because, for category a), answers I've witnessed include, in no particular order: i. self-aggrandizement, e.g. increasing your readership/fanbase/cult of personality to the extent, in some notable cases, of recreating the world in your own image; ii. making a living; iii. contributing to the production of quality literature in the world; iv. helping others learn, grow, and develop new understandings of self and the world around them.

for category b), answers I've seen include: i. to get famous; ii. to scratch an itch; iii. to discover what you think you know and open it up for revision.

I've seen way too many people engaged in subcategory i (or probably that should be I) pursuits. it consistently makes me mad, and then subsequently sad. I mean, really, who the hell would *want* to be famous? just *look* at the kinds of lives hollywood stars live. yeah, so they've got the cash and nice houses and great bods and whatnot, but I have to ask myself if they even really *live* at all. maybe angelina jolie-- she is taking flying lessons after all. but they can't even go out in public without getting mobbed and tabloids publishing and twisting their private relationships to shreds. I know there are a lot of people who feel sympathy is wasted on the rich and famous who've clearly chosen their own paths. I'm just saying: fame. can you honestly tell me it's a GOOD thing?

I dunno. maybe you think so. we all have differently-compelled and -enabled egos. mine says to me:

"make stuff that's fun and whimsical, sometimes even weird. take a risk, explore; poke and gaze and work it all up into something lovely and captivating-- then put it out on a little table on the front lawn for people who walk by to look at, pick up and shake, sniff, sing to, etc.

"and then pick up by the seat of its pants what you know, and what you're in the process of learning and reassessing, and go into a classroom-- and take a can opener to other people's heads. put that can opener into the people's own hands and invite them to poke around inside. make a place where everybody involved can lever out the grey lump and work it into stupendous concoctions. go, ooooooooh, collectively."

dubious attics & barge-driving lessons & groundhog hillside & artificial sight

lisa and merritt have moved into another big old house with a mansion-sized fireplace and rooms without 90 degree angles-- instead the sides of rooms angle gently inward, forming outside alcove courtyards. lisa is selling shares in some enormous roll of carpeting that they've gotten ahold of, and I buy in and then immediately regret it because I know I can't afford it. I keep wanting to see the attic and then being told all over again that it's not a good idea and going, oh, yeah. right. I forget now what's wrong with it, but something ominous.

there are barge-driving lessons on the river, and I'm taking part. there is some discussion of a canoe-type boat and whether or not it's what people are calling a tanker.

I'm walking across a hillside, my arms swinging at my sides, when the knuckles of my right hand brush over one of the many holes in the ground-- and something clamps on-- not painfully, just alarming me. I look down, and in my hand is a prairie dog (though the word in my head in the dream is "groundhog"). I shake it off, and, there, still in my hand, is it's baby. it's miniature and adorable, and I think about hanging on to it as a pet, but then think better of it and place it gently at the mouth of the burrow it's parent has disappeared down. I continue across the hillside, realizing the ground is full of burrows and small creatures, vulnerable at my feet.

someone points out a man in the room and tells me he has artificial sight-- he was blind in one eye, and another of the tenants devised the solution-- there's a chip implanted, not in the damaged eye, but rather in the tip of his nose-- it's mapped to a vast universe of coordinates the designer has spent the last twenty years plotting. he shows me examples of the patterns penciled on the wall of the room, travelling all over it, describing it entirely.

Friday, March 18, 2005

busy brain

these days as soon as I wake up, the dreams fly right out of the room, driven by the force of whatever waking idea comes barrelling in. this morning I wake up writing part of my dissertation, fleshing out an idea on the page by using the puppet-people from my dreams themselves to play out the discussion with one another or else sitting at a desk writing out the ideas I intend to, and do, get to myself once I'm more awake.

homeowner to-do list

3:30 a.m., post-bath.

- connect roof vent tube to bathroom vent, reconnect fan
- back bedroom: paint walls, floors, closets; put in low cupboards on eaves closets, built in shelving above; put rods in closets proper
- stairway: runner; shelves?
- fix up basement front room for a workspace: add shelving; paint walls, ceiling, floor; put in carpeting? area rugs?; get new dehumidifier; figure out why dehumidifier keeps tripping the circuit breaker
- laundry room: add three-quarter bath; paint to brighten walls, ceiling, floor
- all basement: new window well windows to brighten

Wednesday, March 16, 2005

perennial overwhelm

sometimes, even tho there's never any question about any possibility of keeping all these balls in the air, I drive myself nuts trying. sometimes, when my head aches for two days straight like this, I suspect it might be ready to blow. sometimes I'm juggling jobs, for pay or pro bono (though in my line of work that's more the rule and therefore seldom named as such). often what I'm juggling is sarahs-- the poety sarah, the teachery sarah, the researcher-scholar sarah, the friend sarah, the sister sarah, the hermit sarah, the cut-to-the-chase-and-say-what-nobody-else-is-willing-to-air sarah, the movie-watcher sarah, the hikey-campy sarah (god, somebody please wake her up-- it's been like a hundred years already), the arty sarah, the hand-makey book sarah, the homeowner sarah, the bill-and-tax-payer sarah... phew. that's all I have the energy to track at the moment. but, believe you me, it's a house of mirrors in here (and you thought juggling out in the open was difficult...)

so sometimes I put on the socks with the individual toe sockets and no-skid ladybugs on the bottoms and feel better instantly.

Tuesday, March 15, 2005

food poisoning

okay, so refried beans not, probably, the culprit. still waiting for the alien to bust out. please please get it out of me.

oh right-- ides of march. how appropriate.

unholy frijoles

it's really hard to know for sure whether the refried bean is your best friend or your worst enemy. one day it's a marvelous uberfood: tasty, easy to eat, filling, packed with protein-- but then another--[queue dramatic music] duhn duhn duhn-- it's got you in its evil clutches, up with middle-of-the-night throes of zinging pain accompanied by unsavory emissions.

such flip-flopping behavior is just no good in a relied-upon food.

and a dilemma-- of course I'm going to throw out the rest of that can of beans-- but what about the three others I got at the same time? are their contents part of the same tainted batch? and I constitutionally loathe waste. so do I risk another (or potentially *three*) excruciating night(s) up in the wee hours? I suppose I could give the unopened and suspect cans to the food bank, but that seems like a rather shabby trick-- potentially! because who knows! friend or foe?

Monday, March 14, 2005

in which thefacebook.com lets me down

I am so very very sad at the moment. not only to learn that the father of a dear friend of mine died recently-- and, no, I do not include this in this post in any glib way. quite frankly, not only is it awful news, impossible to respond to other than lamely and uselessly, painful to sit by while a friend suffers. also it's a wake-up call for me with all my blather-- that there are far more weighty and grievous things going on in the world, and that perhaps I ought not to be quite so blythe and irritating. also that my own parents are no vernal poultry. and I've no idea how I'm going to react when the inevitable comes to pass, as it does more and more frequently for my contemporaries. either that or long-term care necessities. the stuff of real life.

with this perspective, what does it really matter that my new toy only allows membership to the micro-section of the population who happen to have .edu email addresses?... only that I've just emailed a whole slew of my favorite people, prompted, probably foolishly, to mash the "Invite" button. and now they're going to be not only pestered with my group-emailing but also frustrated should they actually attempt to join. gr. and feh.

evidently it's time for my nap.

yikes, I have OPINIONS

who knew? well, okay, so my students know it quite well. also people who've been in classes I took myself as a student. the classroom is, apparently, a forum where I feel comfortable, nay, compelled to air my position-- I sometimes fear, annoyingly so. but in the rest of the world not so much. not so much online, where I've tended to retreat into the un-accountability of my dreams. how's that for slippery? just try to call me on what I said, buster-- it's a dream! ha! hm. possibly a lame device. I certainly hope that's not the only reason I've been doing it all these years. scary thought. the truth is, there are just very different rhetorical goals and strategies that we can serve by writing or talking-- and I've tended to largely steer clear of the argumentative. small wonder, knowing my dad. but somehow I feel like I'm coming into it now. like it's okay-- to use more of my palette, work with more of my toolbox. this morning my thought on waking was how cool it would be if I could assign all my students to learn something in an entirely new (to them) mode-- for example, if the assignment was on the somatic, to take carpentry or knitting. if the assignment was on the proprioceptive, then dance or one of those trapeze school things like carrie did on sex and the city. on the auditory, then voice lessons or flute or what have you. on the visual, painting or photography. see, this way I could really begin to home in on what working in the various semiotic modes really does for us, heuristically-- which is the basis of my dissertation. the only problem would be resources (who to teach these diverse skills?) and, more significantly, time. I mean, a semester's only so long. and learning is excruciatingly gradual. then again, somehow, through tapping novel modes, it seems possible to make cognitive leaps. like, look at me having opinions. for real. that's all about the blogging, I'm pretty sure. having my static, fix-it-up-locally-with-dreamweaver-and-upload-it-via-ftp web site just didn't get me to this particular rhetorical/cognitive place. weird, huh? for years something else, then this. it's kind of overwhelming actually. kinda tempted to pull the plug, at least for a little bit. maybe it's NOT such a good thing I have so much undisturbed time on my hands this week... then again, if my phone stays silent and my inbox empty, at least I have someone to talk to.

nevermind the manic laughter and wide, staring eyes.

we are all forevermore in high school

doesn't matter what you do. doesn't matter where you live. people are people and people are high schoolers. through and through. this is the key to the cult popularity of napoleon dynamite, and why I myself adore it. also rushmore (different socio-economic bracket). we don't ever grow up, silly goose! what were you thinking? maturity? responsibility? well, okay, yeah, so some of us hold jobs, raise kids, balance checkbooks. I know I'm hardly the authority on worldly progress. but I've seen how those people behave too. we are all of us high schoolers, for goodness sakes. take my word for it. that mom backstage at the church choral production herding those madcap three-year-olds-- she's the insecure bossy girl who never has the right hair accesories. that marketing manager? she's the niblet with the four thousand boyfriends and the hot car. that sales guy? he's a hockey player, I don't care if he hasn't strapped on skates in years. and that vivacious guy with the awesome wardrobe and the killer sense of humor? he's that closeted loser who took art or never came out of the band room. just get us together in one place, trying to work together or at least coexist, and the truth will be made clear unto you. life is high school. we never graduate, not really. and god help the teachers.

I'm sorry for the cynicism, but you know it's entirely age-appropriate.

names & faces

so, thanks to daniel, I've joined the collective. no, not stoopid poopy friendster, bastion of the socially mercenary-- I'm talking about thefacebook. where you can connect via your skooooool connections. college/grad school AND high school. it's just like that publication we had at hotchkiss, names & faces, which we (girls) used to pore over literally for hours-- memorizing who was who, who was dating whom, identifying cute boys. and the boys, well, they in all likelihood pored over the thing, too, just not in our sight line. it was kinda like the yearbook, as a resource, only way better because it came out at the beginning of the year. each new school year you'd go in to the registrar's office on the first day to get your picture taken for your i.d. card (what did we even do with those things when I was in h.s.-- late 80's--? me, nothing. except collect them in a box as testimonial to my vast improvement over time) and apart from laminating your photo in rigid plastic, They'd used it to fill the pages of names & faces, with name and home address beneath each photo-- which was, frankly, quite useful at boarding school. not only for sending christmas cards, but also for identifying who else came from the midwest, who the super-fancy manhattanites were, and who hailed from darien and greenwich (tho to be honest that was pretty self-evident). and who came from the midwest but seemed, or wanted to seem, like they came from darien or greenwich (aka, lake forest and grosse pointe). and who came from places just completely off the map of the known world ("tennessee? kentucky?? florid-- now, wait just a minute here, this has to be a joke-- do people acually live there? I thought it just shut down when we left."). I always craved a names & faces of college and grad school-- especially when I was in the writers' workshop, which is every bit just like high school otherwise, so why the heck not. it might have helped me get a lay of the social landscape. cuz, my friends, make no mistake: it's a minefield out there. it helps to know where to step and where to tread carefully. yeah, so. but thefacebook.com isn't entirely the same thing, then. I mean, beyond the obvious, digital and what-all. it's more, I dunno, Proactive, I guess. the rabble taking the printing press into their own sweaty grimey hands. you know-- like the web used to be. power to the people. unfortunately, you can't necessarily count on seeing what people look like, since some of us are uncooperative and put up photos of our front porch. but come on! what if that cute boy in biology class thinks I'm vain?

Sunday, March 13, 2005

fun with blogging

[testimonial of the converted]
check it out! if I want to post more than one entry on a single day, I so totally CAN! how cool is that?

I take back every nasty thing I ever said about weblogs.
[/testimonial of the converted]

how I spent my spring break

so while everybody and their cousin fred is traipsing off this week to san francisco (where I should be, if I hadn’t so badly budgeted cash that I couldn’t afford a plane ticket) for professional composition conferences and visits to friends and excellent restaurants and so on, I shall be cooling my heels right here in iowa. now, now, I’m not complaining—and I forbid you to feel the least bit sorry for me—the fact of the matter is that a span of days undisturbed in my lovely home with zero outside obligations and even few (but a couple, so not to despair entirely) friends left in town to offer distraction is precisely what the doctor ordered. and just how am I using these great glorious lakes of undisturbed time? glad you asked: working on my web site’s appendages, joining lovely new cybersphere communities, playing with pots and pans and my excellent new blue mixer in the kitchen, working on several collage boxes, getting class-teaching stuff squared away at a sane pace, and bringing my brain back into line on the diss: sifting through the beginnings of my AWESOME student data, gorgeous multimodal projects, and doing little manageable bits of writing that, over time, are accumulating into a larger whole. how excellent! couldn’t be better, now could it? see, told ya not to feel sorry for me. aaaaaahhhhhh.

photosensitive

for days, even weeks, at a time I’ll forget to open the curtains in my bedroom. for one thing, I don’t spend a whole lot of time in there during the day. for another, the curtains are semi-translucent, so it’s hardly dark in the room. but there’s a big difference between direct and indirect light, and I know it, even if I tend to forget about its importance through busyness and neglect. neglect, in particular, of charlie the cat. I mean, I don’t single him out for neglect or anything—hardly, in some ways he’s even my favorite (tho I don’t like to advertise the fact around the others). I’m simply prone to extensive albeit unintentional neglect of those I love, and it’s always been that way. I’m dramatically periodic in my attentions—when I remember to do so, I’m all about the cuddle and wide-eyes-only-for-you—but the truth is, I’m in this space rather infrequently. far too infrequently for my ex-husband, let me tell you. and the evils of this tendency in the current case are compounded by the fact that charlie the cat lives most of his time upstairs, in my bedroom. so, you know, he doesn’t literally get to see much light of day. fortunately, my most excellent $1 armchair from the auction sits right by the best window in the bedroom and makes for an optimal snuggle spot when I do (appropriately enough, on a sunday) get recalled to my senses and scoop him up for a few minutes’ injection of love. and its lovely and easy enough to reach up and snag the curtain back behind the iron holder, so we can bask in the bath of light together. I mean, for gracious sakes, it’s no wonder the poor cat is so durn fat—he’s probably deeply depressed.

Friday, March 11, 2005

an ode

oh, laptop, how I love thee. when my body is exhausted, joints sore with insomnia, susceptible to chill, sneezing and blowing, but the racket in my brain sprung in small hours won’t kindly shut up, I can lie most pleasantly abed, muffled in flannel, propped by pillows, and give vent to the odd bits I can’t seem to slough. like projects in compulsive collection. like interstellar transcriptions. ibook, my trusty buddy, so shiny and white, so portable and flexible, so handy with usb and firewire ports for flash drives and dv recorder downloads. the best debt ever. debt being something I have a degree of expertise in.

Wednesday, March 09, 2005

creative genius versus...

the best work tells a compelling, somewhat puzzling, and to varying degrees resolvable story.

I, on the other hand, get caught up setting the scene in exquisite details-- and all too often leaping to moral conclusions.

Monday, March 07, 2005

venice vision

an hour and a half west of g.p., and here's the idea: move west & market my aesthetic-- a shop called "farmland garden," import/sell midwest stuff + shop locally and sell midwest-type stuff-- keep a record player playing scratchy copies of bessie smith, tom waits, squirrel nut zippers, m ward, gloria deluxe?, etc. have a samovar set up with tea + teacakes or other snacks. lamps and indirect lighting. sit there and make collages on an old farmhouse kitchen table. also little books. also have wireless internet. maybe also an espresso machine? food and drink on/in old dishes, linens. squishy chairs, low tables. nextdoor thru the heavy curtain: "brocade lounge". wine and beer. smoking, if excellent ventilation. old spinny ashtrays. dark walls, dark textiles: reds. sconces. overstuffed. tiny stage for singer acts. out back: shared courtyard terrace. roses & water fountains. little lights in pachysandra. stone flags. candles on tables. live down the street in a small arts & crafts bungalow.

Friday, March 04, 2005

who's who of the damned

just that. it's a poem title, I believe, for a poem as yet unwritten.

Thursday, March 03, 2005

cattywampus

the whole thing was tilting: walls, floors, doorways, staircases, all gone crazy. windows idiosyncratically aimed gazes into sky or, alternately, ground. everything inside trembled, live and inanimate-- elderly lapdogs cowered under beds while antique dressers heaved themselves across hardwood floors. and each time we moved, the whole thing shifted with us: make for the door, and the floors headed south; retreat too quickly, and the walls ground backward in sudden overcorrection. we were frozen in place, terrified to turn it, to send everyone and everything crashing down one way or another. still, some made dashes and attained the outdoors-- but once outside, how could they live with the guilt? a few ran back in to do what they could toward salvation, ushering out anything they could lay hands on-- a cat, a stranger. some worked the exterior, searching for ropes and adequate anchorage. we were miles from civilization, off the map, off the radar, unlooked-for. we were on our own, doing our best with disaster. I discovered a cell phone in my hand and told the rest I'd call for help, but somehow never placed the call. maybe there wasn't time, maybe we tipped, maybe I had immediate issues staring me down. eventually, we knew they were on their way, but what could they do? we knew we were in for it. we were in it: to go down or make it out alive all on our own devices. we gritted teeth, touched one another's shoulders, readied ourselves for whatever was coming next.